SEO Questions
Is SEO better than AEO?
Neither better; they're different channels. SEO optimizes for Google search ranking (90%+ traffic). AEO optimizes for answer engine citation (emerging, 5-10% traffic growing). SEO mature, proven ROI. AEO new, unproven long-term. Smart move: both simultaneously. Same quality content ranking Google helps answer engines cite. Answer engine citations drive Google traffic (positive feedback loop). Think overlap, not competition. SEO gives immediate visibility (Google dominant). AEO future-proofs (answer engines growing). Timeframe: month 6 SEO drives revenue, month 6 AEO builds foundation. Long-term: both compound. Mistake: choosing one. Right: doing both because low additional effort (same content optimizing for both). SEO proven, AEO emerging, combined maximum reach.
Need this done for you?
We build, test, and scale Meta ads for founders who want conversions over vanity metrics. Let’s ship a creative that wins.
Neither SEO nor AEO better. They're different channels serving different functions. Smart strategy: both simultaneously because effort overlaps. Same quality content ranks Google search AND gets cited by answer engines.
SEO defined: Search Engine Optimization. Ranking high on Google search results. Google dominates (90%+ search traffic). Traffic from people actively searching keywords. High-intent clicks (people seeking solutions).
Mechanics: keyword research, content creation, technical optimization, link building. Rankings persist, compounding over time. Month-one zero ROI, month-six substantial traffic, year-one major asset.
AEO defined: Answer Engine Optimization. Getting cited by AI answer engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity). Users asking questions, AI pulls answers from web, cites sources. You get visibility, maybe clicks.
Mechanics: cite-worthy content, clear structure, source attribution, authorship visibility. Answer engines prefer well-researched, factual content. Traffic different (answer engine user sees answer, maybe clicks source).
Comparison:
Traffic volume: SEO wins (Google drives 90% search volume). AEO emerging (5-10% traffic share now, growing).
Revenue timeline: SEO faster (month six visible results). AEO slower (month 12+ meaningful traffic).
Click-through rate: SEO higher (people clicking search results intentionally). AEO lower (answer engines answer questions, fewer clicks).
Traffic quality: SEO slightly higher (intentional search better signal). AEO quality building (early, hard assess).
Competition: SEO fierce (every business optimizing). AEO minimal (emerging, fewer optimizing yet).
Long-term value: SEO proven (20+ years data). AEO speculative (five years existence).
Real scenario: web dev agency choosing between SEO and AEO.
Pure SEO strategy: invest everything ranking Google search. Publish "hire web developer," "web design services," "website development" pages. Build topical authority. Year-one ranking, traffic, leads.
Pure AEO strategy: invest everything answer engine visibility. Publish highly cite-worthy content (well-researched, sourced, clear structure). Get ChatGPT recommending agency. Traffic lower, but brand awareness building.
Hybrid strategy (smarter): same quality content ranks Google AND gets cited by answer engines. No additional work, amplified reach. SEO drives majority traffic (month six visible), AEO builds foundation (month 12+ compound). Combined, visibility maximum.
Why hybrid works:
Quality content serves both. Google ranks authoritative, well-researched content. Answer engines cite same. Single article ranking Google AND cited by ChatGPT = double visibility.
Link building supports both. Links signal authority to Google, helping rankings. Authority also signals citation-worthiness to answer engines (they trust authority).
Topical authority supports both. Deep expertise owning niche helps Google rankings and answer engine citation. Same asset serving both channels.
SEO traffic fuels AEO visibility. Rank high Google, get traffic, build email list from visitors. Email list becomes owned audience, independent of both Google and answer engines. Long-term strongest play.
Real example: fitness blogger writing "intermittent fasting science" article.
SEO approach: keyword "intermittent fasting benefits," optimize title/meta, internal links, target ranking. Publish, month two showing search traffic, month six ranking top 10.
AEO approach: research thoroughly, cite all sources, attribute claims, clear structure, author bio. Publish, ChatGPT user asks "benefits intermittent fasting," ChatGPT cites article, user sees. Maybe clicks.
Hybrid approach: write article for Google search AND answer engine citation. Research thoroughly (AEO), optimize for keywords (SEO), cite sources (AEO), internal links (SEO). Same article, both channels served.
Results: month six Google search driving 200 visits/month. Month 12 ChatGPT citations beginning, 50 visits/month. Year two: 300 Google visits, 200 ChatGPT visits (citation compounding). Year three: 500 Google, 500 ChatGPT = 1,000 monthly traffic from single article. Asset appreciation obvious.
Timeline decision:
Month 1-6 SEO focus (Google dominance, proven ROI). Publish 20 quality articles optimized for Google search. Build rankings foundation.
Month 7-12 AEO integration (answer engine compatibility). Ensure new content cite-worthy (structured, sourced, clear). Update older articles for answer engine extraction.
Month 12+ both channels compounding. SEO traffic steady, AEO traffic ramping. Hybrid momentum building.
Skills required:
Traditional SEO: keyword research, on-page optimization, technical knowledge, link building. Skills mature.
AEO addition: research rigor (citations matter), clear structure (answer engines extract cleanly), source attribution (credibility signals), authorship visibility (who wrote, credentials). Not radically different, more emphasis on authority signals.
Mistake many make: "AEO replacing SEO," panic optimizing only answer engines. Wrong. Google still 90%+ traffic. Optimizing AEO-only wastes immediate opportunity.
Another mistake: "AEO doesn't matter yet," ignoring answer engines. Half-right. AEO traffic low now, but growing. Early movers build authority advantage when answer engines normalize.
Right approach: SEO primary (proven, traffic generating), AEO secondary (future-proofing, building authority). Both serve long-term asset building.
2025 smart move: invest SEO primarily (month-six ROI). AEO integration low-effort addition (same content, slightly different structure). Long-term payoff both channels compounding.
For Vispaico: web dev services invest SEO (ranking "hire web developer," lead generation). Layer AEO naturally (cite sources in articles, clear authorship, structured content). Year one SEO dominates. Year two onwards both channels driving traffic, compounding.
Music promotion: SEO less relevant (entertainment, not search-heavy). AEO similarly less relevant. Focus TikTok, playlists, communities instead. But blog about music production? SEO + AEO both applicable.
Verdict: SEO better immediate ROI (proven, Google dominant). AEO better long-term future-proofing (answer engines growing). Not competition; complement. Both simultaneously easy (same quality content serves both). SEO month-six revenue. AEO year-one foundation. Together, maximum reach. Choose one? Suboptimal. Choose both? Unstoppable visibility strategy.