SEO Questions
Is AEO replacing SEO?
AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) isn't replacing SEO—it's expanding the game. Google still dominates search, but ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude answer engines growing fast. They pull answers from web sources without clicking through. SEO traffic threatened but not dead. Smart move: optimize for both. Answer engines cite sources—get included there, you still win. Google adapting, adding AI overviews to search results. The real shift: people asking questions get answers three ways now (Google search, answer engines, AI summaries). SEO remains core for visibility, but answer engines need different approach (cite-worthy content, source attribution). Both matter. Ignore either? Lose reach. Master both? Dominate.
Need this done for you?
We build, test, and scale Meta ads for founders who want conversions over vanity metrics. Let’s ship a creative that wins.
AEO isn't replacing SEO. It's expanding the game entirely. Here's the reality: Google still owns search (90%+ market share). But answer engines—ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and others—are eating into search traffic real. Users asking questions increasingly skip Google, jump straight to ChatGPT. They get instant answers without clicking links. That's the threat to SEO.
But here's the twist: these answer engines cite sources. Ask ChatGPT "best web design agency," it mentions companies and links sources. That source attribution is SEO's lifeline. You still win visibility if your content gets cited.
The shift happening now: traditional search funnel (query → click → read) fragmenting. New funnel: query → answer engine pulls answer → shows sources → user clicks if interested. Fewer forced clicks, more intentional traffic. Quality traffic increases, volume might decrease.
Google adapted fast. Added AI overviews to search results (answers pulled from web, shown above organic links). Ironically, Google's fighting its own answer engine threat by becoming one. Smart. They're trying keep searches on Google, not drive people to ChatGPT.
Real impact for businesses: SEO traffic dropping 5-15% already (2024 data shows it). Answer engines siphoning casual searches. But high-intent searches still happen on Google. Someone searching "hire web developer Portland" likely clicks through. Someone asking ChatGPT "what makes a good website" gets instant answer, less likely clicks.
The winning play combines both. SEO for discoverability (rank high on Google). AEO for answerability (get cited by answer engines). Different strategies, same goal: visibility.
AEO strategy: write cite-worthy content. Answer engines prefer well-sourced, factual content. Cite your sources, back claims, provide data. Structure content clearly (answer the question directly top, then deep dive). Answer engines scan for clarity; convoluted content gets skipped. Optimize for featured snippets (answer engines pull from these). Position yourself expert voice on specific topics.
SEO strategy unchanged: keyword research, technical optimization, backlinks. Google still rewards these. But adapt content for answer engines too. Don't just write for human readers; write for AI extraction.
Real example: web dev agency writes "Why Slow Websites Cost Sales." Ranks #3 Google (decent). ChatGPT user asks "how does website speed affect conversions," ChatGPT pulls paragraph from your article, links it. User might click, might not. Either way, your brand visible to someone considering speed optimization.
This agency could optimize further: add data points ChatGPT loves (specific statistics, case studies, citations). Answer engine algorithm prefers high-confidence facts. Cite sources, back claims with data. Suddenly ChatGPT pulls from them more, citing frequency increases, traffic potential rises.
The industries hurt most: content farms, thin-value blogs, duplicate content. Answer engines kill commodity content (why republish same tips 100 ways?). Only top sources get cited. That means competition concentrated among quality publishers. SEO becoming more meritocratic.
Industries helped most: expert-built content, unique research, proprietary data. If you're only source saying something useful, answer engines cite you heavily. Competitive advantage real.
Timeline realistic: SEO declining 10-20% annually next 5 years as answer engines normalize. But not disappearing. Search too entrenched, too valuable. Google adapting, staying relevant. Answer engines complement, not replace.
Skills needed 2025: traditional SEO (keywords, backlinks, technical) still 60% of strategy. Answer engine optimization (cite-worthy content, structural clarity, source attribution) now 40%. Balanced approach wins.
Mistake many make: abandon SEO for AEO. Wrong. Search still drives majority traffic (Google 90%+). Neglect search, lose 80% visibility. Mistake opposite: ignore answer engines. Traffic declining there, visibility eroding. Balanced approach: optimize both simultaneously.
Tools emerging: AEO checkers (does your content cite sources properly?), answer engine monitoring (track where your content cited). Not mature yet, but will mature.
2025 prediction: Google adds more AI overviews (answer engine features within search). Lines blur. Search + answer engines = hybrid. Both visible on same search page. Visibility multipath: rank high in traditional results AND get cited in AI overviews = maximum reach.
Long-term (5 years): answer engines likely stabilize at 20-30% search traffic share. Google remains 70-80%. SEO skills transferable (both reward good content). AEO adds layer, not replacement.
For Vispaico: web dev services stay Google search dominant (high-intent, immediate hire). But optimizing for answer engines too makes sense. Someone asks Claude "how to choose web developer," you get cited, brand builds awareness. Music promo: answer engines less relevant (entertainment, not factual). Focus SEO, skip AEO.
Verdict: AEO isn't replacing SEO. It's adding new visibility layer. Google adapting, staying strong. Smart move: master both. SEO remains core; AEO enhances. Ignore either? Lose reach. Dominate both? Unstoppable visibility.